On (10/10/12 14:06), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kmemleak tree got a conflict in
> mm/kmemleak.c between commit 85d3a316c714 ("kmemleak: use rbtree instead
> of prio tree") from Linus' tree and commit 48786770bf3b ("kmemleak: do
> not leak object after tree insertion error") from the kmemleak tree.
>
> The kmemleak tree commit has been there since April, should it have
> progressed by now? Its fix is also included in the above commit from
> Linus' tree.
>
> I just used the version from Linus' tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
Oh, my bad! Just took a look on current create_object(). I guess we can
drop my patch.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
