David and Stephen, I apologize for not taking the necessary steps to verify our patches before submission. Ignorance is not an excuse... Anyways David thank you for fixing the issue for us. Jay- -----Original Message----- From: David Miller [mailto:davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:48 PM To: sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vipul Pandya; Jay Hernandez Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:06:15 +1000 > Actually, for me it is. I have a script that does the "use > yesterday's version" for me. To fix (even a one liner) means bringing > up an editor, commiting, creating the patch and then recommiting it > (an implementation > detail) and recording that I need to keep (automatically) applying the > patch in case the maintainer doesn't react quickly. Ok, fair enough. I'll try to look into making x86 barf when a vmalloc.h include is missing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
