linux-next: manual merge of the md tree with the tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Neil,

Today's linux-next merge of the md tree got a conflict in fs/bio.c
between commit 4363ac7c13a9 ("block: Implement support for WRITE SAME")
from the block tree and commit 368e564836d3 ("block: makes bio_split
support bio without data") from the md tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
(no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc fs/bio.c
index f855e0e,dbb7a6c..0000000
--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@@ -1485,20 -1511,19 +1485,21 @@@ struct bio_pair *bio_split(struct bio *
  	bp->bio2.bi_size -= first_sectors << 9;
  	bp->bio1.bi_size = first_sectors << 9;
  
- 	bp->bv1 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
- 	bp->bv2 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
- 
- 	if (bio_is_rw(bi)) {
- 		bp->bv2.bv_offset += first_sectors << 9;
- 		bp->bv2.bv_len -= first_sectors << 9;
- 		bp->bv1.bv_len = first_sectors << 9;
- 	}
+ 	if (bi->bi_vcnt != 0) {
+ 		bp->bv1 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
+ 		bp->bv2 = bi->bi_io_vec[0];
 -		bp->bv2.bv_offset += first_sectors << 9;
 -		bp->bv2.bv_len -= first_sectors << 9;
 -		bp->bv1.bv_len = first_sectors << 9;
++		if (bio_is_rw(bi)) {
++			bp->bv2.bv_offset += first_sectors << 9;
++			bp->bv2.bv_len -= first_sectors << 9;
++			bp->bv1.bv_len = first_sectors << 9;
++		}
  
- 	bp->bio1.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv1;
- 	bp->bio2.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv2;
+ 		bp->bio1.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv1;
+ 		bp->bio2.bi_io_vec = &bp->bv2;
  
- 	bp->bio1.bi_max_vecs = 1;
- 	bp->bio2.bi_max_vecs = 1;
+ 		bp->bio1.bi_max_vecs = 1;
+ 		bp->bio2.bi_max_vecs = 1;
+ 	}
  
  	bp->bio1.bi_end_io = bio_pair_end_1;
  	bp->bio2.bi_end_io = bio_pair_end_2;

Attachment: pgpT29FWADRWp.pgp
Description: PGP signature