On 06/03/2012 09:32 PM, Len Brown wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> with your patch applied and CONFIG_ACPI=n, I still get:
>
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:445:12: warning: ‘register_acpi_bus_type’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:446:12: warning: ‘unregister_acpi_bus_type’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> so I think I prefer the patch below.
Hi Len,
I'd love to see your failing .config file if you have it or can
reproduce it. My patch still works for me.
> thanks,
> Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> On 05/23/2012 12:14 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Fix header file warnings when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled:
>>
>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:443:42: warning: 'struct acpi_bus_type' declared inside parameter list
>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:443:42: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:444:44: warning: 'struct acpi_bus_type' declared inside parameter list
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> --- linux-next-20120523.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> +++ linux-next-20120523/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> @@ -440,6 +440,8 @@ static inline int acpi_pm_device_sleep_w
>>
>> #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>>
>> +struct acpi_bus_type;
>> +
>> static int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *bus) { return 0; }
>> static int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *bus) { return 0; }
>>
>
>
> Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: fix acpi_bus.h build warnings when ACPI is not enabled
>
> introduced in Linux-3.5-rc1 by
> 66886d6f8c9bcdee3d7fce5796dcffd6b4bc0b48
> (ACPI: Add stubs for (un)register_acpi_bus_type)
>
> Fix header file warnings when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled:
>
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:443:42: warning: 'struct acpi_bus_type' declared inside parameter list
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:443:42: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:444:44: warning: 'struct acpi_bus_type' declared inside parameter list
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index b0d6282..9e6e1c6 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -440,8 +440,8 @@ static inline int acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool enable)
>
> #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> -static int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *bus) { return 0; }
> -static int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *bus) { return 0; }
> +static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
> +static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
