Hi Al, could you please add/merge the patch below which fixes a simple compile error in linux-next caused by your signal work? Thanks, Heiko >From 4a3f68ac251d9559b44d511e8b2e44098d59deb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:09:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] s390/signal: fix compile error Fix simple compile error caused by "pull clearing RESTORE_SIGMASK into block_sigmask()" in linux-next. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/kernel/signal.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c index 1c961e5..ac565b4 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs) if (is_compat_task()) handle_signal32(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs); else - handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs)); + handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs); return; } -- 1.7.10.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
