David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote: > > > Sorry, got it... CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled below... > > > > pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 > > Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 5, 2097152 bytes) > > Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 4, 1048576 bytes) > > Mount-cache hash table entries: 4096 > > Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct > > Initializing cgroup subsys devices > > Initializing cgroup subsys freezer > > POWER7 performance monitor hardware support registered > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > kernel BUG at /scratch/mikey/src/linux-next/include/linux/gfp.h:318! > > Yeah, this is what I was expecting, it's tripping on > > VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(nid)); > > and slub won't pass nid < 0. You're sure my patch is applied? :) I did have your patch applied but at "b4cdf91 sched/numa: Implement numa balancer" (where git bisect spotted the fail). If I apply your patch on the full next-20120521 it does fix the problem. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks! Mikey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
