On Thursday 17 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2012 08:06:01 -0700 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:50:54PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > > Now that the bulk of at91sam9g20-related nodes are located in at91sam9260.dtsi, > > > > we have to re-create the path to this ADC node for SoC specific parts. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Should we apply this patch in arm-soc so that Greg can drop the hunk that > > > no longer applies? > > > > It's not a "no longer applies", it's a "this does not merge". The patch > > is in my tree, unless you want me to revert it, it's going to stay there > > until it goes to Linus. > > Just apply the patch to the arm-soc tree - then the merge resolution > becomes "use the arm-soc version". There is no need for Greg to revert > the other patch. > Yes, good point. I've applied the patch on the at91/dt branch now. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
