Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:57:47PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:44:30 +1000
> 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in
> > arch/sparc/boot/Makefile between commit 51f19cfa76d7 ("sparc32: drop
> > build time btfixup patching") from the sparc-next tree and commit
> > 95698570510b ("kbuild: refactor final link of sparc32") from the kbuild
> > tree.
> > 
> > I have no idea, so I used the version from the sparc-next tree.
> > 
> > Sam, can you have a look and work this out, please?
> 
> As Sam states in:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/159094/
> 
> 	This patch will conflict badly with a patch in kbuild-next.
> 
> 	The fix is simple - drop all changes from kbuild-next.
> 
> :-)
The above comment is true for both arch/sparc/Makefile and
arch/sparc/bot/Makefile.

sparc-next will also conflict with net-next.

net-next add the following line to arch/sparc/Makefile:
+core-y                 += arch/sparc/net/

The fix is to add this line to the newly introduced
arch/sparc/Kbuild file like this:

obj-y += net/

Sorry for these conflicts but we have been busy in sparc land
this round.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux