On Monday 07 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> + static void __init u8500_cryp1_hash1_init(void)
> + {
> + db8500_add_cryp1(&u8500_cryp1_platform_data);
> + db8500_add_hash1(&u8500_hash1_platform_data);
> + }
This is actually not correct any more because of the
other changes: each device addition should also pass the parent
pointer so the device is created in the right position.
Stephen, your fix is ok for linux-next and I expect everything
to still work, but we should not merge it into v3.5 this way.
Thanks for the fixup.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
