On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:56:39AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:41 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > After the recommended change, the in-kernel config using a single gadget > > > driver (the target) are able to build. Thanks for the detailed > > > explanation btw.. ;) > > > > > > I've made the same change for tcm_usb_gadget in lio-core, and updated > > > for-next-merge with the following merge patch: > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git;a=commit;h=0c41520201bc0933d65b8644173802778f426234 > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any other changes that should go into > > > sunday's linux-next build. > > > > It looks ok to me. You can add my Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > > > Thanks Felipe! > > So with your Ack in place and if there are no more objections, the plan > is now to take tcm_usb_gadget through target-pending/for-next-merge > (along with sbp-target) for an initial upstream merge. > > Also, I'm fine if USB folks would prefer to take this via their tree > now that the gadget target is residing within drivers/usb/gadget/, but > AFAICT this looks harmless enough to merge directly via the target tree. That's fine with me as well. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
