On 01/05/12 18:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 30 April 2012, Ryan Mallon wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Can you please add the following branches: >> >> ep93xx-cleanup >> ep93xx-fixes >> >> from the ep93xx git tree: >> >> git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git >> >> To linux-next. Both branches are stable and based on v3.4-rc2. Testing >> for the tree is covered by the arm ep93xx_defconfig. >> > > Hi Ryan, > > just for your convenience, it helps if you have only one branch that > you get included into linux-next and that combines various branches > which you intend to send to arm-soc. That frees you from the need to > notify Stephen every time you want to have another branch included. Thanks for the tip. I leave the branches as is for the moment. If I end up adding any additional branches to my tree, then I will look at creating an ep93xx-for-next branch then. In this case, should the for-next branch just be a regular merge of all the other branches I have? How do I make it verifiable that everything from the other branches has been being tested in the for-next branch? Thanks, ~Ryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
