On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:14:52 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Minor matter: that's non-responsive to my suggestion. > > > > If it's moved to a new cgroup then we can just go back to the original > point that I made as was trying to avoid: adding #ifdefs all over > mm/memcontrol.c in a dozen or so places. A mm/hugetlbcg.c would only be > built, natually, when we have "depends on HUGETLB_PAGE" and > linux/hugetlb.h takes care of the rest (setting HUGE_MAX_HSTATE for archs > that don't define it themselves, in other words only one hugepage size). And if it isn't moved to a new cgroup then your memcg-add-hugetlb-extension-fix.patch is suboptimal. Why is this so hard? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
