On Monday 16 April 2012 07:42 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On 12-04-16 02:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2012 09:38 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
As I said in the commit log, it doesn't seem to make sense to export
them when they are trivial enough to be static inline, since it
avoids having them pollute the /proc/kallsyms namespace.
It is almost like having basic inb/outb as functions vs inline; it
just doesn't make sense to me.
However, if you are determined to rewrite the patch in another way,
please add the customary reported-by line.
I am fine on either way i.e. inline or exporting symbols only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
