Hi Anton, On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:11:32 +0400 Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I pulled my current battery tree into next-20120326, and I can't reproduce > the issue (using allmodconfig on x86_64). I have moved the battery tree to after the mfd tree in my merge sequence so we will see if that helps. I really hate having ordering dependencies in linux-next (since they change over time and people have to remember to tell me and to send stuff to Linus in the right order). Also, it means that you are not testing exactly what you are sending to me - I assume that your testing must be including the mfd tree somehow. These sort of things should be fixed by having the common code in a separate (stable) branch that is merged into both trees. Or in some cases by merely cherry-picking a very small number of commits from one tree to the other. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpXKYZpuMAdc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
