Re: Boot failure with next-20120208

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:16:41 -0800
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> > The bug looks pretty generic, nothing very PPC-specific there.  It 
> > might affect other architectures - we won't know until we find out
> > wht caused it.
> 
> well one half of the race looks pretty generic...
> ..... doesn't mean the other half of the race is though....
> 
> 
> > 
> > Ho hum, I suppose I should pull the patch out of linux-next, to
> > avoid disrupting other testing.  This means it's going to be hard
> > to get the bug fixed.
> 
> it means losing this one big PPC machine indeed.... until they hit
> that same race some other way with regular real cpu hotplug ;-(

So we're kinda stuck with this.  As I can't merge it, I guess I'll make
smp-start-up-non-boot-cpus-asynchronously.patch disappear.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux