Hi,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:36:14AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> I'm seeing a build failure in linux-next:
>
> CC init/main.o
> In file included from /es/linux/linux-next/arch/c6x/include/asm/pgtable.h:76:0,
> from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/mm.h:44,
> from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/ring_buffer.h:5,
> from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/ftrace_event.h:4,
> from /es/linux/linux-next/include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/syscalls.h:78,
> from /es/linux/linux-next/init/main.c:16:
> /es/linux/linux-next/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h: In function 'pmd_none_or_trans_huge_or_clear_bad':
> /es/linux/linux-next/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:476:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_clear_bad' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
>
> This patch added some functions to asm-generic/pgtable.h which should
> have been placed in the CONFIG_MMU conditional block:
>
> Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Mar 21 10:48:00 2012 +1100
>
> mm: thp: fix pmd_bad() triggering in code paths holding mmap_sem read mode
>
>
> The following patch fixes the build problem for me:
Thanks for noticing this problem.
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index 202c010..8ba3ba5 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -342,6 +342,64 @@ static inline void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct mm_struct *mm,
> __ptep_modify_prot_commit(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> }
> #endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_MODIFY_PROT_TRANSACTION */
> +
> +/*
> + * This function is meant to be used by sites walking pagetables with
> + * the mmap_sem hold in read mode to protect against MADV_DONTNEED and
> + * transhuge page faults. MADV_DONTNEED can convert a transhuge pmd
> + * into a null pmd and the transhuge page fault can convert a null pmd
> + * into an hugepmd or into a regular pmd (if the hugepage allocation
> + * fails). While holding the mmap_sem in read mode the pmd becomes
> + * stable and stops changing under us only if it's not null and not a
> + * transhuge pmd. When those races occurs and this function makes a
> + * difference vs the standard pmd_none_or_clear_bad, the result is
> + * undefined so behaving like if the pmd was none is safe (because it
> + * can return none anyway). The compiler level barrier() is critically
> + * important to compute the two checks atomically on the same pmdval.
> + */
> +static inline int pmd_none_or_trans_huge_or_clear_bad(pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> + /* depend on compiler for an atomic pmd read */
> + pmd_t pmdval = *pmd;
> + /*
> + * The barrier will stabilize the pmdval in a register or on
> + * the stack so that it will stop changing under the code.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> + barrier();
> +#endif
> + if (pmd_none(pmdval))
> + return 1;
> + if (unlikely(pmd_bad(pmdval))) {
> + if (!pmd_trans_huge(pmdval))
> + pmd_clear_bad(pmd);
Problem is, this fixes MMU=n but it'll break x86 with MMU=y and THP=n.
These functions shall be placed after pmd_trans_huge you see at the
end of asm-generic/pgtable.h .
The simplest fix is that you add #ifdef CONFIG_MMU around it instead
of moving (I guess you can keep pmd_trans_huge and the rest at the end
of the file inside CONFIG_MMU too as it shall never be called as it
all takes pmds/ptes as parameter).
Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
