Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (arm-soc tree related)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 15 March 2012, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:39:38PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 March 2012, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > > That's my mistake.  I did a pull request for the wrong branch.  Olof,
> > > could you please drop the offending branch and I'll submit a new pull
> > > request once I have a chance to test Arnd's irq patch?
> > 
> > I reverted this in the for-next branch for now. The two initial patches
> > from the kirkwood/board branch are still present.
> 
> Okay, thanks.  I've rebased onto next/boards and merged the
> depends/irqdomain branch.  I'm making progress, but not finished yet.

Ok. I hope we can still make it for v3.4, but I think it won't be
much of a problem if not -- it will get merged into linux-next
just after v3.4-rc1 in case we don't make it, and then you have
plenty of time to improve it further.

> How is a pull-request done in the above scenario?  is my merge commit
> included in the series?  what is the pull-request based on?
> next/boards, or depends/irqdomain?

You should base it on depends/irqdomain.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux