On Thursday 08 March 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-palmtt.c between commit ddba6c7f7ec6 ("OMAP1:
> pass LCD config with omapfb_set_lcd_config()") from the omap_dss2 tree
> and commit 2e3ee9f45b3c ("ARM: OMAP1: Move most of plat/io.h into local
> iomap.h") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for fixing up all the conflicts between arm-soc and omap_dss2.
I think we should make sure they are resolved in one of the trees before
the merge window.
Tomi, what are your plans for the omap_dss2 branch to get merged?
Do you think you should send it to Linus first and we merge it into
arm-soc to resolve the conflicts?
Or do you want to merge it through the arm-soc tree?
Or should we go first and you fix up the conflicts by pulling in the
necessary topic branches from arm-soc into your tree?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
