> can we sinply introduce a macro irq_is_valid
See the 2005, 2006 and 2008 discussion.
if (!dev->irq)
is the proper test.
The <= is just a temporary thing while ARM gets its publically visible
house in order so it can be done without breakage.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
