linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the arm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tejun,

[Tejun, I know you told me about these, but I am reporting them anyway
just for completeness.]

Today's linux-next merge of the memblock tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mm/init.c between commit 27a3f0e91bed ("ARM: sort the meminfo
array earlier") from the arm tree and commit 0dac7e2d90aa ("memblock:
Kill memblock_init()") from the memblock tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 786addd,7c38474..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@@ -310,7 -331,8 +311,6 @@@ void __init arm_memblock_init(struct me
  {
  	int i;
  
- 	memblock_init();
 -	sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]), meminfo_cmp, NULL);
 -
  	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
  		memblock_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);
  

Attachment: pgpRrIvvrm7zN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux