On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:02, Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unfortunately, NO_IRQ is often not spelled "NO_IRQ". It looks like the assumption
> "irq < 0 === no irq" may be quite a lot more widespread than "NO_IRQ === no irq".
Can we make irq unsigned, and hope the compiler catches all of them
(comparison always
false blah blah blah)?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
