> This is now broken on ARM where, for good or bad, NO_IRQ currently is > used and is -1. Good. ARM developers have been told to change this for several years. The nice approach hasn't worked, the patient approach hasn't worked so now finally ARM is going to be dragged kicking and screaming into doing the work everyone else did several years ago. I have so little sympathy over this that you'll need a quantum physicist to measure it. > Half-removing NO_IRQ is going to be problematic, though... > I really don't care whether the "no irq" value is 0 or -1, but it is > abundantly clear that choosing different values to mean the same thing > on opposite sides of an interface does not work. You've had years to fix it. If I were you I'd delete NO_IRQ from your tree, type make and get it done. It's not even a big job to clean it out. At that point various other drivers will also start working properly on ARM because they use 0 for polled mode. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
