On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > One option is to test this patch on a board that is now broken: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/10/290 That seems broken. Spot the trouble: + ret = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier, + oirq.size); +no_irq: +#ifdef NO_IRQ +#if NO_IRQ != 0 + if (ret == NO_IRQ) + pr_warn("Hit NO_IRQ case for your arch. Drivers might expect " + "NO_IRQ, but we return 0. If anything breaks, driver " + "have to be fixed.\n"); +#endif +#endif + return ret; It claims "we return 0", but then doesn't return zero.. Hmm? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
