Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stephen,

On 11/09/2011 10:15 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
arch/m68k/Kconfig between commit d890d7399525 ("m68k/irq: Remove obsolete
m68k irq framework") from the m68k tree and commit 4e8a9e70dfe8 ("m68k:
selection of GENERIC_ATOMIC64 is not MMU specific") from the m68knommu
tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.

Thanks. Both this and the previous m68k merge conflict patch look good.

Geert: would you prefer I hold off on these 2 patches until after
you merge your IRQ changes?

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close,                            FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux