On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:51:37 -0500
Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am fixing it now. Jeff missed a stub for the non-freezer case.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/freezer.h b/include/linux/freezer.h
> index a155561..cd2d55b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/freezer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
> @@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ static inline void set_freezable_with_signal(void) {}
>
> #define wait_event_freezable_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
> wait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, condition, timeout)
> +#define #define wait_event_freezekillable(wq, condition) \
> + wait_event_killable(wq, condition)
>
>
Yep, silly oversight on my part -- sorry about that. That's exactly
what I was planning to do, so you can add my acked-by on that patch...
Thanks,
Jeff
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the cifs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > iseries_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/cifs/transport.c: In function 'wait_for_response':
> > fs/cifs/transport.c:328: error: implicit declaration of function 'wait_event_freezekillable'
> >
> > Caused by commit f06ac72e9291 ("cifs, freezer: add
> > wait_event_freezekillable and have cifs use it"). In this config,
> > CONFIG_FREEZER is not set.
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
> >
>
>
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
