----- Original Message ----- > From: "NamJae Jeon" <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrei Warkentin" <awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Chris Ball" > <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 7:20:48 PM > Subject: Re: mmc core broken dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK (Was: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc)) > > Hi Randy, Andrei. > > I suggest third option for this. > As you know, MMC like ATA Driver and SCSI Driver etc.. can not enable > without CONFIG_BLOCK > So I think that mmc should be depended from CONFIG_BLOCK like other > block device driver. > see the their Kconfig. How do you think ? MMC core doesn't not imply MMC_BLOCK. You could well use SDIO devices via MMC without any flash storage whatsoever. What I want to say is that MMC_BLOCK already depends on BLOCK. MMC, however, has no such functional dependence, as it just (effectively) provides bus and device enumeration. So I think the better solution is wrapping all MMC partition code within mmc/core/mmc.c and card.h with CONFIG_BLOCK. A -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
