On Wednesday 31 August 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:16:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > [Sorry about the delay. My build machine is being slow. > If this is alread fixed, sorry about the noise.] > > > When CONFIG_BUG is not enabled (I see this on x86_64): > > fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function 'jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata': > fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1176: error: implicit declaration of function '__WARN' > > > asm-generic/bug.h does not provide a version of __WARN() when > CONFIG_BUG is not enabled... > Hmm, my feeling is that we shouldn't do that either, and that jbd2 should be changed. If we want a function that does what __WARN() does today, we should probably make a conscious decision about what we want it to be called and not have it start with "__". Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
