On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:46:15PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Paul E. McKenney > <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:23:37PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Paul, > >> > >> After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > >> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: > >> > >> kernel/rtmutex.c: In function '__rt_mutex_slowlock': > >> kernel/rtmutex.c:605:3: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value > > > > There actually already are parentheses around it, and the first pass > > through the loop it is uninitialized at that point. But hey, that > > is gcc for you! Does the patch below cure it? > > > Yes. Thank you! Thanx, Paul > - Arnaud > > >> Introduced by commit 83841f021d4b ("rcu: Permit rt_mutex_unlock() with > >> irqs disabled"). > > > > If it does, then I will fold into that commit. > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c > > index 0222e34..2548f44 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rtmutex.c > > +++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c > > @@ -602,7 +602,8 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, > > > > raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); > > > > - if (was_disabled = irqs_disabled()) > > + was_disabled = irqs_disabled(); > > + if (was_disabled) > > local_irq_enable(); > > > > debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html