Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, 

On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:14:11 +0200 "Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, it is not as easy as it seems. As the patch set describes, I am
> build testing for x86 and OMAP. At the moment due to config
> dependencies it is _impossible_ to disable PM in the OMAP config.
> 
> Also I cannot build test every platform out there.
> Do you have a procedure for build testing?

I do not expect developers (or even maintainers) to build for every
architecture/platform  - that is partly what linux-next is for (see
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next ).  It is good to see you at
least thought about the !PM case.  Can't it be turned off in x86?

I am a bit sensitive about these sort of build errors as I see it happen
way to often that a developer make a typo in the !CONFIG_XXX stubs.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp2fB0pFLb7Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux