On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:58 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the security-testing tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c: In function 'reiserfs_security_init':
> fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c:69:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_old_inode_init_security'
>
> Caused by commit 9d8f13ba3f48 ("security: new
> security_inode_init_security API adds function callback"). Forgotten
> include?
>
> I have used the security-testing tree from next-20110809 for today.
No, I left out the stub definition in the include. James, how do you
want me to correct this and the missing 'inline'? Should I be updating
the original patches or submitting them as new patches?
thanks,
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
