On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:56 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Vinod, that slave-dma tree patch should probably remove the bare "struct > scallerlist;" since it now includes scatterlist,h. > Yes, makes sense Dan does this look good to you From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:08:10 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove struct scatterlist for header Commit 90b44f8 introduces dmaengine_prep_slave_single API which adds scatterlist.h in dmaengine.h, so defining struct scatterlist is not required Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h index 0d738c9..ace51af 100644 --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h @@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ #include <linux/dma-direction.h> #include <linux/scatterlist.h> -struct scatterlist; - /** * typedef dma_cookie_t - an opaque DMA cookie * -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
