On 2011-08-02 10:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 09:26:14 +0200 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Thanks, will you carry this until things are merged? Not easy for me to >> fix up. > > Yes, no problem. It is possible that the module.h split may not even go > into v3.1, in which case the fix patch will jst become part of the moduleh > tree after the block tree is merged. > > Though the feedback to the original patch writer is that they should have > included module.h instead of relying on it being implicitly included. That would arguably have been a much saner approach. > You could include a patch to add an include of module.h to this file in > your tree - that way even if the module.h split goes ahead, your tree > won't get broken. It could then be changed to the lighter weight > export.h later. OK, I will add that. Thanks. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
