On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Just in case anyone needs reminding: Please do not add anything destined >>> for v3.2 into linux-next included trees until after v3.1-rc1. >>> >>> The powerpc allyesconfig and sparc defconfig build (at least) fail today. >>> >>> Changes since 20110728: >>> >>> New tree: moduleh >>> >> >> See all those followup/fixup patches the last day, might be not such a >> good idea to include this tree :-). > In the opposite, that is all the point of including a tree in -next: > give expose to code :) > Agreed... and I know about the risks of linux-next (even as a Debian/sid user) :-). - Sedat - > - Arnaud > >> I wait for next Monday's linux-next. >> >> - Sedat - >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
