Hi Al,
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:55:24 +0100 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:32:32PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
> > failed like this:
>
> > And many more similar. Again, I assume some include files changed.
> > Maybe commit 347727d3f51d ("superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker
> > infrastructure") which included linux/mm.h in linux/fs.h ...
> >
> > I have left this again.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 1ce9086..e0569e4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
I added this patch to the end of linux-next today and it fixed both the
sparc and sparc64 build problems. Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpFg0eV3lp1t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
