Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russell,

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:04:41 +0100 Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:35:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > BTW, Russell, commit 29cb3cd208dd above changed the return type of
> > exynos4_cpu_suspend() from void to int but did not add any return
> > statement ...
> 
> That's fine - it ends with a call to panic() which is declared as a
> function which never returns.  Therefore, exynos4_cpu_suspend() itself
> never returns.

Ah, yes.  Unfortunately, the s5p tree changes removed the panic.  So, I
guess the merge needs some other fixup.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpscQ8egw2FF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux