On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 18:17 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in > arch/openrisc/kernel/module.c between commit 07319a81a55f ("OpenRISC: > Module support") from the openrisc tree and commit 7c71b2f8e35c > ("modules: make arch's use default loader hooks") from the rr tree. > > This is an indirect conflict that turns up because > arch/openrisc/kernel/module.c is based very closely on a file that is > modified by the rr commit. I have just used the openrisc version of the > file, but I assume that much of it could be removed. The OpenRISC tree should depend on that patch from Rusty's tree and the file arch/openrisc/kernel/module.c should be a bit simpler. I'll push out an updated OpenRISC tree this evening that has that fixed and we'll see if the conflict doesn't go away. That said, I don't quite understand why there's a conflict there at all... the OpenRISC tree should have been independent of that patch in any case. /Jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part