On 07/09/2011 01:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 23:34,<james_p_freyensee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: J Freyensee<james_p_freyensee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In a certain compile configuration, functions like
'kmalloc' and 'copy_from_user' were coming up as
implicit errors. This patch adds slab.h and
uaccess.h to the driver.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Please don't add "Acked-by" lines before people have ack'ed your patches.
Okay...so should I re-send this patch out without the Acked-by in it?
Or is it okay this time and next time please do this?
Signed-off-by: J Freyensee<james_p_freyensee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/misc/pti.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/pti.c b/drivers/misc/pti.c
index 8653bd0..4ba4e5f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/pti.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/pti.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
*/
#include<linux/init.h>
+#include<linux/slab.h>
+#include<linux/uaccess.h>
#include<linux/sched.h>
#include<linux/interrupt.h>
#include<linux/console.h>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
