Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



于 2011年07月01日 18:37, Stephen Rothwell 写道:
Hi,

On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:10:30 +0800 Cong Wang<amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

于 2011年07月01日 15:08, Stephen Rothwell 写道:

On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:32:04 +0800 Cong Wang<amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>   wrote:

于 2011年07月01日 13:19, Stephen Rothwell 写道:

After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c: In function 'rtas_restart':
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c:655:24: error: 'SYS_RESTART' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c: In function 'rtas_power_off':
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c:664:24: error: 'SYS_POWER_OFF' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c: In function 'rtas_halt':
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c:674:24: error: 'SYS_HALT' undeclared (first use in this function)

Caused by commit ac050ff2a176 ("It is not necessary to share the same
notifier.h").

I think the following patch will fix this.

Please find all the other files that need that include as well (there is
at least one more).


Ok, I will do a cross-compilation.

Well, really any file that references any of those defines should be
including linux/reboot.h, now - whether a compilation gets errors or
not.  A change in CONFIG options or different platforms/architectures can
change what file get implictly included.

See Rule 1 in Documentation/SubmitChecklist.

Yeah, I did allyesconfig test on x86. Fortunately there are few
files that needs to be fixed since they include reboot.h implicitly.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux