Hi Greg, On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:14:48 -0700 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:21:55PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:34:23 -0700 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:09:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:05:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > No, I still get these: > > > > > > > > > > In file included from drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_035.c:7:0: > > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/addi_common.c: In function 'i_ADDI_Attach': > > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/addi_common.c:2765:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_bus' > > > > > > > > > > virt_to_bus is only defined for 32 bit powerpc (not 64 bit) (and maybe > > > > > not at all on some architectures e.g. sparc). > > > > > > > > > > From Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt: > > > > > "All drivers should be using these interfaces with no exceptions. It > > > > > is planned to completely remove virt_to_bus() and bus_to_virt() as > > > > > they are entirely deprecated. Some ports already do not provide these > > > > > as it is impossible to correctly support them." > > > > > > > > Drivers that use virt_to_bus should Kconfig depend on VIRT_TO_BUS. > > > > > > Ah, I missed that, sorry. I'll go make that change as well. > > > > Ping? > > Sorry, been swamped with other work, I'll get to this soon... ping? > With a very relative value of soon. Yeah, I understand busy ... but this is a simple patch, rigth? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpX6U7THYFAr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
