Hi Greg, On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:00, Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/03/11 08:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:43,<gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Âwrote: >>> slso on the for-next branch in that tree, so will get some testing >>> in the next tree for the next few days. >> >> defconfig is now a nommu-config, and it fails? >> >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4012794/ > > Yep, that looks wrong. I'll move the define for KBUILD_DEFCONFIG > into arch/m68k/Makefile (and remove the existing defines in Makefile_mm > and Makefile_no). That will make the DEFCONFIG as it was before, > multi_defconfig. > >> arch/m68k/kernel/entry_no.S:47: Error: Unknown operator -- statement >> `save_all' ignored > > This is due to compiling for the non-mmu targets and not using > a m68k-uclinux- toolchain. Unfortunately the compiler must define > __uClinux__ to compile for non-mmu targets. This isn't new, we For userland... > have had this problem ever since the merge of the header files. > (The exported headers need some switch to use to base some > conditionals on, and kernel config options cannot be used in > exported headers). For kernels, we can explicitly define this in arch/m68k/Makefile if !MMU, right? > But with a fixed defconfig, you won't see this anymore :-) > > I'll fix up the git commit on m68knommu git tree. Good, thx! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂÂ ÂÂ -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
