On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:55:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the cleancache tree got a conflict in >> mm/truncate.c between commit 5adc7b518b54 ("mm: truncate: change >> remove_from_page_cache") from Linus' tree and commit 03e838947c8a >> ("mm/fs: add hooks to support cleancache") from the cleancache tree. >> >> I fixed it up (see below) but am really not sure of the fix. ÂI can carry >> this fix as necessary. >> >> Is this stuff going to be merged into Linus' tree this time round? >> -- >> Cheers, >> Stephen Rothwell          Âsfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> diff --cc mm/truncate.c >> index a956675,cd94607..0000000 >> --- a/mm/truncate.c >> +++ b/mm/truncate.c >> @@@ -106,8 -108,13 +108,12 @@@ truncate_complete_page(struct address_s >>    cancel_dirty_page(page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); >> >>    clear_page_mlock(page); >> Â-  Âremove_from_page_cache(page); >>    ClearPageMappedToDisk(page); >> Â+  Âdelete_from_page_cache(page); >> +   /* this must be after the remove_from_page_cache which >> +   Â* calls cleancache_put_page (and note page->mapping is now NULL) >> +   Â*/ >> +   cleancache_flush_page(mapping, page); >> Â-  Âpage_cache_release(page);    /* pagecache ref */ >>    return 0; >>  } > > I did the cleancache_flush_page() before the delete_from_page_cache(), > in case the delete_from_page_cache() freed the page. ÂI didn't actually > check whether that makes sense though. I am not sure cleancache's put and flush semantic. If I understand rightly with old __remove_from_page_cache's comment, maybe cleancache_flush_page is to invalidate the page.(If I understand right, I hope the name is changed to cleancache_invalidate_page) " /* * if we're uptodate, flush out into the cleancache, otherwise * invalidate any existing cleancache entries. We can't leave * stale data around in the cleancache once our page is gone */ if (PageUptodate(page)) cleancache_put_page(page); else cleancache_flush_page(mapping, page); " So I think cleancache_flush_page should be done after delete_from_page_cache because delete_from_page_cache calls cleancache_put_page(maybe this function would flush the content of memory into cleancache's target) before we invalidates the page. And it should not be a problem in case the delete_from_page_cache freed the page since cleancache should have a reference the page but I didn't check cleancahe always has a reference of page. If it isn't, it's a critical problem. Dan, Could you comment this? -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html