Hi MyungJoo,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:08:24PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> +static struct irq_chip max8997_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "max8997",
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED
> + .irq_bus_lock = max8997_irq_lock,
> + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = max8997_irq_sync_unlock,
> + .irq_mask = max8997_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = max8997_irq_unmask,
> +#else /* CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED */
> + .bus_lock = max8997_irq_lock,
> + .bus_sync_unlock = max8997_irq_sync_unlock,
> + .mask = max8997_irq_mask,
> + .unmask = max8997_irq_unmask,
> +#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED */
> +};
You actually don't need to define both pointer sets. Setting the irq_* ones
should be enough for both configs.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
