Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Guys,

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:45:35 +0100 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2011-03-17 11:36, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:18 +0000, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you point me at the commit in question? Generally,
> >> elv_queue_empty()
> >> can be replaced by blk_peek_request(). 
> > 
> > The interesting commit is this one:
> > http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/c7519dbf6
> > 
> > The point of it is to enable this
> > http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commitdiff/a32159024
> 
> OK, can you commit a change just changing that to blk_peek_request()?
> That'll avoid the conflict.

I am still reverting those three commits from the mtd tree ...  David, I
assume that you are going to want to ask Linus to merge the mtd tree at
some point soon?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgps2_LR1zMWR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux