Hi Dave, On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:56:12 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:53:12 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:31:35 +1100 > > > > > > > Maybe some config option changed ... > > > > > > Perhaps GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED? > > > > Yep, that has been turned on for powerpc now. I guess you will have the > > same problem on sparc64 of you merge the net-next and sparc trees ... > > Yeah, powerpc alone compiles with GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED as it > does not have that notify commit. > > If you add net which has that notify commit, but not the fix it > breaks. I wonder whether Dave should pick that fix into net. So, if you merge the commit 1fb0ef31f428 ("genirq: Fix affinity notifier fallout") from the tip tree, you will get exactly one new commit and will fix your tree properly with no adverse effect on anyone else. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpW1Et7OO7ay.pgp
Description: PGP signature