On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 01:26:16AM +0530, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:44:52AM -0800, Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
> > @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@
> > #include <linux/nls.h>
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
> > +#endif
>
> You should never need a #ifdef in a .c file for an include file. If so,
> something is really wrong.
I agree. Also, i realized that the include was not required to address the
reported error. Please find the revised patch here.
From: Narendra K <narendra_k@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix compilation error when CONFIG_ACPI is unset
This patch fixes compilation error descibed below introduced by
the commit 6058989bad05b82e78baacce69ec14f27a11b5fd
drivers/pci/pci-label.c: In function âpci_create_firmware_label_filesâ:
drivers/pci/pci-label.c:366:2: error: implicit declaration of function âdevice_has_dsmâ
Signed-off-by: Narendra K <narendra_k@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/pci-label.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
index 824e247..8c80138 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
@@ -174,6 +174,12 @@ pci_remove_acpi_index_label_files(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return -1;
}
+static inline bool
+device_has_dsm(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#else
static const char device_label_dsm_uuid[] = {
--
1.7.3.1
With regards,
Narendra Kÿô.nlj·Ÿ®‰†+%ŠË±é¥Šwÿº{.nlj·¥Š{±þw±·ø¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚj:+v‰¨þø®w¥þŠàÞ¨è&¢)ß«a¶Úÿûz¹ÞúŽŠÝjÿŠwèf
