Re: linux-next: Tree for March 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 4
From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:46:31 +0000
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20110306225210.GA9085@mako-laptop>
References: <20110304180027.20deb6c4.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110306225210.GA9085@mako-laptop>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:52:10PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:

> Looking at surrounding code it's missing ifdef for CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.

Yup, should be fixed now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- linux-next: Tree for March 4
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: linux-next: Tree for March 4
  - From: Mariusz Kozlowski

Prev by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 4
Next by thread: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the x86/cpus4096 trees
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux