On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:17:34 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:24:31PM +0530, Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > This patch fixes the following build breakage introduced by the patch > > '[PATCH V3] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string to > > sysfs'. > > First, you should include this as part of your original patch so that > the build doesn't break during bisection. > > > This is fixed by making fs/nls/nls_base.c compile conditionally into > > vmlinux by introducing a new config option CONFIG_NLS_BASE which is > > selected by (ACPI || DMI || NLS). > > Why? > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_NLS) += nls/ > > +obj-y += nls/ > > You seem to have just broken building any of the NLS code as modules. > > > menuconfig NLS > > tristate "Native language support" > > + select NLS_BASE > > All CONFIG_NLS does is build nls_base. > > > +config NLS_BASE > > + bool "Base NLS functions" > > + depends on ACPI || DMI > > What in this code depends on ACPI or DMI? > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_NLS) += nls_base.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_NLS_BASE) += nls_base.o > > And why make this change? > > Just have something like > > select NLS if (ACPI || DMI) > > in drivers/pci/Kconfig. Narendra, can you send me an updated patch including the build fix? Either using this approach or the other one I outlined in my other mail. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
