On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:35:28 +0100
David Jander <david.jander@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:54:36 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27_3ds.c arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm038.c
> > arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-mx31_3ds.c
> > arch/arm/mach-mx3/mach-mx31moboard.c between commit
> > 5836372e8a0ba5cc633f61bc0484ee20c86f4b36 ("ARM: imx+mx3: convert to
> > mc13xxx MFD") from the i.MX tree and commit
> > e84e545d47d26644275a79fe5ebc1797bcb80910 ("mfd: mfd_cell is now
> > implicitly available to mc13xxx drivers") from the mfd tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
>
> Your fix seems correct, although I fear I am too dumb to understand
> why commit e84e545d47d26644275a79fe5ebc1797bcb80910 introduces this
> extra struct nesting.... AFAICS gcc will end up doing the same as
> without the extra nest.
It was requested in this thread:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/551441/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
