On 02/10/11 13:12, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 02/11/2011 02:38 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/10/11 13:00, Nitin Gupta wrote: >>> Both zram and zcache use xvmalloc allocator. If xvmalloc >>> is compiled separately for both of them, we will get linker >>> error if they are both selected as "built-in". We can also >>> get linker error regarding missing xvmalloc symbols if zram >>> is not built. >>> >>> So, we now compile xvmalloc separately and export its symbols >>> which are then used by both of zram and zcache. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta<ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap<randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> but what does this patch apply to? It does not apply cleanly to >> linux-next of 20110210. >> > > This applies to staging-2.6. I thought linux-next won't be that > different so as to produce conflicts. Can you please send reject files, > or let me fetch linux-next tree and will soon post patch against the same. I'll let you fetch linux-next. I merged it by hand and test-built it successfully. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
