On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 16:47 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > The actual problem here is that some people, notably the msm folks, > are > bypassing the maintainer hierarchy and going straight to Linus for > their > pull requests instead of asking RMK to pull. We once debated this at I don't think it's fair to single out MSM here. Going straight to Linus was discussed at one point, as I recall, and Russell didn't oppose it at the time. There are a number of ARM sub-architecture maintainers that do this.. None of that is related to the rejects created here, those would happen no matter who we submitted pull requests to. I think the issue is more that MSM is actively being cleanup , and Russell is touching code that we're working on also. So we need a way to work together .. In this case the collision is so simple that either Linus or Russell would just fix it up while pulling, and both would likely be fine with that. In the past I've tried to fix up these issues, but now I think maybe it's doesn't matter. In terms of Russell rebasing, I don't really like that. I've based MSM trees on Russell's stable branch and it's worked in the past. If Russell's rebasing then we can't really do that, so one tool to fix these problems is gone. Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
